Quality attracts quality. My fee is $1 per word, a unique 500 word article is $500. High quality products generate high value results. I can produce a unique, high quality, 500 word, well-researched article with references and links every 2 days. Please clarify subject matter and verifiable references as to your authenticity. Thank you.
Writing sample:
Hoover, Truman and Eisenhower on Deportation of Illegals©
7-11-10 by Akos Kovach
I have been inundated recently proponents and opponents of SB 1070. Several ofthese forwarded emails which referred to ‘three Presidents with guts’. Everyone has a right to express their opinion, thank G_d and our Constitution for that. The irony is a true supporter of the Constitution would immediately recognize the weaknesses and inequities of SB 1070.
Where the actions taken by these three Presidents effective? Research revealed these pesky facts:
Hoover- project - Mexican Repatriation – 1929 -1939
The Hoover Administration faced the horrors of the Great Depression by first looking at funding shortfalls and also how to increase employment. With large Mexican communities in states such as California, Texas, Colorado, Illinois and Michigan the campaign to ‘repatriate’ Mexicans began without Due Process, (does this sound familiar)?
Various sources claim anywhere from 1 to 2 million Mexicans were returned to their homeland during the 10 years this program was in effect. But the term “Repatriation” was actually inaccurate, as some statistics indicate approximately 60% of those sent back to Mexico were actually American citizens.
But what the heck, the publicity was great and support was easily drawn to the notion we should ‘kick those illegal scoundrels out’ and make jobs available for the good people living here legally and looking for honest work. Hmm, this also has a ring of familiarity to it…
Truman – project – Stop Mexican Farm Workers - 1951
In response to a special commission incepted by Truman (the President's Commission on Migratory Labor) the President determined illegal farm workers were causing job shortages.
In a letter to Congress 59 years ago (on July 13, 1951) Truman
outlined his strategy to prevent Mexican farm workers from working in America. Truman’s effort is attributed to have deported some 3.4 million Mexicans.
Eisenhower – project - Operation Wetback – 1954
Seeking ways to find jobs for both WWII and Korean veterans Dwight Eisenhower instituted Operation Wetback. The derogatory expression, wetback, comes from the concept that Mexicans ‘swim the river’ to gain access to America. Apparently geography and facts were as irrelevant then as they are today.
In Operation Wetback Eisenhower is credited with deporting 2.1 million illegals.
But one of the primary issues regarding illegal workers was ignored by all three Presidents, the fact was then as it is now: employers eagerly attracted and hired these workers, happily underpaid them and exploited them for profit.
Is deportation a viable alternative? The short answer is yes, this is certainly a legal alternative yet, as usual, the issue is not as simple, sorting out the issues of an individual versus lumping them altogether opens up yet another Pandora’s Box.
Fast forward to Arizona, July 2010. State Senator Russell Pearce and State Representative John Kavanagh think they have found a better way of dealing with the influx of illegal immigrants - abolish “anchor babies”.
What are anchor babies? Under the 14th Amendment to the Constitution, children born on American soil, even to non-American parents, are entitled to citizenship. Sen. Pearce and Rep. Kavanagh will propose to the Arizona Legislature yet another opportunity for the world to witness the wild west in action. The proposed law will challenge the 14th Amendment's citizenship clause.
In an interview with Tucson ABC affiliate KGUN TV, Governor Brewer stated: “It is illegal to trespass into our country. It has always been illegal, and people have determined that they want to take that chance. They can take their children back with them.”
Those in power learned long ago the importance of “winning” in the eyes of the public. Leaders such as these often prey on the weak, the poor and now they have set their sights the weakest among us - children.
It is a time-proven tactic, to use inflammatory and derogatory rhetoric. Does it serve our great State or our free nation to use terms like ‘wetback’ or ‘anchor baby’? Personally, I think not.
(the Freelancer website required removal of weblinks/references)