c++ final project
$30-250 USD
Pago na entrega
Your final project will be a simple, working C++ program developed using a good, modular design and incorporating sequential, selection and repetitive programming statements as well as at least one function call. You should design, create, and then compile and execute the program. Be sure that your code compiles and executes correctly before submitting it. This project encourages you to use common programming statements and reflect upon your overall design and approach.
Program Specs:
The overall purpose of the program is to allow users to input a list of positive numbers into an array, find the average of the numbers in the array and output the result.
Specific requirements:
The application shall:
1. Allow users to enter 10 numbers in float format
2. Store the numbers in an array
3. Create and use a function to calculate the average of the numbers in the array
4. Output the average
Program Requirements:
Your programm must include each of the following::
Sequential Execution
At least one selection (if-then or if-then-else or case statement)
At least one loop structure
At least one function call
Project Objectives:
Document programs effectively and create and use test data
Use the process of stepwise refinement to construct programs
Demonstrate and explain the execution of sequential, conditional, and iterative programming statements
Create and use functions
Create, compile, and execute simple programs written in a modern object-oriented language
Critically analyze project design solutions
Instructions:
This programming project was developed to satisfy several critical learning goals in the CMIS program at UMUC. In this project you will create a simple, working C++ program that utilizes a good design process and incorporates sequential, selection and repetitive programming statements and functions.
Projects submitted with evidence of plagiarism will be handled in accordance with UMUC Policy 150.25 -Academic Dishonesty and Plagiarism.
Your project is due by midnight, Dec. 6 2010. Your instructor's policy on late projects applies to this project.
Deliverables:
1. Source code file for the project (dot-cpp).
2. Test Data Suite
3. "lessons Learned" Word file.
4. A well-written word document describing (Note that this is an extra deliverable for this project only):
a) Your overall design, including either a pseudocode or flow chart description.
b) Your test plan, including test data and results
c) Your approach, lessons learned, design strengths, limitations and suggestions for future improvement and
alternative approaches
Format:
Documentation format and length:
The word documentation describing and reflecting on your design and approach should be written using Microsoft Word and be no more than 5 pages in length and no less than 2 pages. The font size should be 12 point. The page margins should be 1 inch. The paragraphs should be with double line spacing. All figures, tables, equations and referenced should be properly labeled and formatted using APA style.
Code format:
· Header comment block,
· Appropriate comments within the code
· Appropriate variable and function names, and
· Correct indentation.
Grading:
This activity is awarded 33% of the total grade in the course. In the gradebook, the total number of points will be set to 100. The project elements are assessed as follows:
Attributes
Value
Project Design
20 points
Project Functionality
40 points
Test Data
20 points
Approach documentation
15 points
Approach documentation grammar and spelling
5 points
Total
100 points
The following grading rubric will be used to assign points to your project.
Grading Rubric:
Attribute
Distinguished
Acceptable
Unacceptable
Points
Program Design
(20-16) Points
- Pseudocode accurately reflects design
- Employs proper use of parameters, variables and coding style most of the time
- Employs correct & appropriate use of programming structures most of the time
- Efficient algorithms used most of the time
(15-9) Points
- Pseudocode insufficient to reflect design
- Employs proper use of parameters, variables and coding style some of the time
- Employs correct & appropriate use of programming structures some of the time
- Efficient algorithms used some of the time
(8-0) Points
- Pseudocode not provided
- Rarely employs proper use of parameters, variables and coding style
- Rarely employs correct & appropriate use of programming structures
- Poorly structured and inefficient algorithms
Functionality
(40-31) Points
- Program compiles
- Program executes on most sample data
- Meets most requirements
(30-21) Points
- Program compiles
- Program executes on some sample data
- Meets some requirements
(20-0) Points
- Program does not compile
- Program does not execute on sample data
- Few requirements were met
Test Data
(20-18) Points
- Comprehensive test data suite included with results
(17-11) Points
- Some test data and results included but some vital functionality not tested
(10-0) Points
- Little or no test data suite included
Approach
documentation
(15-13) Points
- Conclusively argues/documents a point of view
- Considers alternatives and shows how and why they should/should not be accepted
- Identifies strengths and weaknesses of the experimental design and of the data
(12-8) Points
- Supports opinions with argument, evidence, or proof
- Considers alternatives but does not eliminate them
- Sometimes identifies strengths and weaknesses of the experimental design and of the data
(7-0) Points
- Offers unsupported or irrelevant opinions
- Does not consider alternatives
- Rarely identifies strengths and weaknesses of the experimental design and of the data
Approach
documentation
grammar/spelling
(5) Points
- No grammatical errors
- Sentence structure and diction are effective and clear
- No obvious spelling errors
(4-3) Points
- Few grammatical errors
- Sentence structure needs improvement
- Some spelling errors
(2-0) Points
- Grammatical errors detract from the readability of the paper
- Sentence structure (run-ons, fragments) needs improvement and impedes readability
- Numerous spelling errors
ID do Projeto: #873966
Sobre o projeto
Concedido a:
Hi, I can do this in less then 24 hours. You can have a look at my reviews. You only pay upon job completion.